David Da Silva I think that's what Bobi's opinion sounds like lol.
Also, just because it sounds wrong compared to social norms and laws, doesn't mean it's a bad opinion. Find a better way to debunk.
I think mine sounds more like "If a child masturbates, he should have the right to" and also "If a child seeks sex from the adult, it would be OK for the adult to give it to him" (Yes, it sounds wrong, but this is what I think) (it's probably not implemented because rapists would force a child to lie about motive in court, and that it's hard to prove motives)
Speaking of that, many would think a child's virginity is a thing too precious, and a child cannot think for himself enough to make a good decision.
But isn't a creative and unique mind (in this case, dark/morbid thoughts) more or just as important than virginity? By sending a child to the therapist for drawing these things, you are killing the expressive person the child could be.
It would also be wrong to stop their development (some would say 'correct'/show the right path) of ideas/art by sending them to the therapist. I feel that is just as much of a violation of their rights as the parallel that David gave.
Anyway, if you want to force your way of thinking onto a child, i think it's a double standard to say that a teenager is fine to be unforced a way of thinking.
I'm actually thinking on multiple perspectives here. The one i actually hold is the 2nd paragraph to 3rd paragraph.
By the way guys, if you are really calling my opinion bullshit, please explain to me properly, because I am really not getting the point.
